AI Compliance for HR-Tech
Employment-related AI is explicitly classified as high-risk under the EU AI Act. Resume screening, interview analysis, and performance management AI face the strictest compliance requirements.
EU AI Act Risk Classification for HR-Tech
Recruitment & Hiring AI
AI systems used in recruitment, candidate screening, and hiring decisions.
Examples in HR-Tech:
- •Resume/CV screening and ranking
- •AI-powered candidate sourcing
- •Video interview analysis
- •Skill and personality assessments
Performance & Workforce Management
AI influencing employee evaluation, promotion, and termination decisions.
Examples in HR-Tech:
- •Performance review scoring
- •Promotion recommendation systems
- •Productivity monitoring AI
- •Workforce planning algorithms
Employee-Facing Chatbots
AI systems interacting with employees requiring transparency.
Examples in HR-Tech:
- •HR helpdesk chatbots
- •Benefits inquiry assistants
- •Onboarding virtual assistants
- •Policy Q&A systems
Administrative HR AI
Back-office automation with minimal impact on employment decisions.
Examples in HR-Tech:
- •Payroll processing automation
- •Time tracking optimization
- •Meeting scheduling AI
- •Document processing
August 2026 Deadline
HR-Tech companies deploying AI in the EU must achieve compliance by August 2026. Start your readiness assessment now to avoid rushing implementation or facing penalties up to 7% of global revenue.
Key Requirements for HR-Tech AI
Bias Testing & Mitigation
Mandatory testing for discrimination across protected characteristics: gender, race, age, disability. Document adverse impact analysis and remediation steps.
Transparency to Candidates
Candidates must be informed when AI is used in hiring decisions. Provide clear explanations of how AI assessments influence outcomes.
Human Review Requirements
All significant employment decisions must include meaningful human oversight. AI should augment, not replace, human judgment.
Data Quality for Training
Training data must be representative and free from historical bias. Document data sources, cleaning procedures, and quality controls.
Audit Trail & Record Keeping
Maintain comprehensive logs of AI-assisted decisions for audit and dispute resolution. Enable reconstruction of decision rationale.
Regular Bias Audits
Conduct annual (or more frequent) bias audits with results publicly disclosed. Implement ongoing monitoring for disparate impact.
Implementation Roadmap
Follow this HR-Tech-specific roadmap to achieve AI compliance. Most organizations complete these steps in 6-12 months.
Audit all AI touchpoints in the employee lifecycle from sourcing to termination
Conduct baseline bias testing across protected characteristics
Implement candidate notification and consent workflows
Design human-in-the-loop processes for all hiring and performance decisions
Establish data governance for employment records used in AI
Create public-facing bias audit disclosure processes
Train HR staff on AI limitations and proper oversight
Implement grievance and appeal mechanisms for AI-influenced decisions
Start Your AI Governance Journey
Get a personalized readiness score and action plan for your HR-Tech AI systems. Our calculator maps your current state to ISO 42001 and EU AI Act requirements.
Get Free AI Readiness ScoreNo credit card required
HR-Tech AI Compliance FAQs
Does NYC Local Law 144 overlap with the EU AI Act?
Yes, both require bias audits and candidate notification for hiring AI. However, the EU AI Act has broader scope covering performance management and promotion decisions. Organizations operating in both jurisdictions should design compliance programs that satisfy both frameworks.
Can we use AI for resume screening without human review?
Under the EU AI Act, high-risk employment AI requires meaningful human oversight. Fully automated rejection of candidates without human review would likely violate compliance requirements. Design workflows where AI assists human decision-makers.
What about AI used for internal mobility, not external hiring?
The EU AI Act explicitly covers AI used for "task allocation based on individual behavior or personal traits" and "monitoring and evaluation of performance." Internal mobility and promotion systems using AI are subject to the same high-risk requirements.
How do we handle AI vendor compliance?
As a "deployer" under the EU AI Act, you share compliance responsibility with AI vendors. Require vendors to provide conformity assessments, bias testing documentation, and technical documentation. Include AI Act compliance clauses in vendor contracts.
Explore Other AI Compliance Industries
Kevin A
Principal Security & GRC Engineer
Kevin is a security engineer turned GRC specialist. He focuses on mapping cloud-native infrastructure (AWS/Azure/GCP) to modern compliance frameworks, ensuring that security controls are both robust and auditor-ready without slowing down development cycles.
About RiscLens
Our mission is to provide transparency and clarity to early-stage technology companies navigating the complexities of SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) compliance.
Who we serve
Built specifically for early-stage and growing technology companies—SaaS, fintech, and healthcare tech—preparing for their first SOC 2 audit or responding to enterprise customer requirements.
What we provide
Clarity before commitment. We help teams understand realistic cost ranges, timeline expectations, and common gaps before they engage auditors or expensive compliance vendors.
Our Boundaries
We do not provide legal advice, audit services, or certifications. Our assessments support internal planning—they are not a substitute for professional compliance guidance.
SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary compliance standard for service organizations, developed by the AICPA, which specifies how organizations should manage customer data based on the Trust Services Criteria: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.
Get your personalized SOC 2 cost estimate
Free • No sales calls • Instant results