Skip to main content

SOC 2 vs ISO 27001

SOC 2 vs ISO 27001: Cost Comparison

Understand how pricing differs between SOC 2 and ISO 27001—auditors, tools, internal time, and retests.

Audit Readiness Validation

Establish Your Audit Baseline

Get your readiness score, identify critical gaps, and unblock enterprise deal velocity in under 2 minutes.

Validate Readiness Now
AspectSOC 2ISO 27001
Audit feesVaries by Type I vs II and scopeCertification body fees plus surveillance audits
Internal timeSecurity, engineering, IT, and leadership for evidenceISMS owners, risk committee, internal audit time
ToolingLogging, access reviews, ticketing, pentestSame plus risk management tooling and document control
RetestsPentest retests, control remediationFollow-up audits for nonconformities
RenewalsAnnual report refreshAnnual surveillance, full recert every 3 years

Decision guide

  • Budget SOC 2 Type I as a first milestone, then expand to Type II or ISO as customer requirements grow.
  • Use ISO if you need a certifiable standard for international or regulated buyers; factor in surveillance costs.
  • Keep pentest and logging budget shared across both frameworks to reduce duplicate spend.

FAQ

Is ISO always more expensive?

Not always, but ISO includes certification and surveillance costs. SOC 2 cost depends on Type I vs II and scope complexity.

Can we reuse tooling?

Yes. Access reviews, logging, ticketing, and change management tools support both. Add risk tools for ISO if needed.

How do retests factor in?

Plan for pentest retests and remediation for SOC 2; plan for nonconformity follow-ups in ISO.

What about consultant costs?

Both may use advisors. Keep control ownership internal and use consultants for gap analysis or policy refinement.

Do we need separate auditors?

Typically yes—CPA firms for SOC 2, certification bodies for ISO. Some groups offer both; ensure independence requirements are met.

How do we avoid double-spending?

Share a single control library, evidence store, and cadence. Align pentests and access reviews to serve both frameworks.

Last updated: 2026-02-04