Skip to main content
Independent Analysis

Resolver vs Neo4j: Which Compliance Platform is Better in 2026?

Compare Resolver and Neo4j head-to-head. See pricing, features, integrations, and our expert verdict on which compliance automation platform is right for your business.

Summary

Updated February 2026

Both Resolver and Neo4j are established compliance automation platforms. Your choice depends on team size, budget, and compliance scope.

Resolver

  • Starting at $15,000/year
  • Best for: Organizations with mature risk management needs

Neo4j

  • Starting at Contact Sales
  • Best for: Enterprise organizations
Last updated Jan 2026By RiscLens Research TeamOur methodology170 reviews analyzed

Sources: G2 Crowd, Capterra, Vendor Documentation, User Interviews

Independent research·No vendor payments·Updated Feb 2026
Feature
Resolver
Neo4j
Industry Fit
Enterprise Risk Management
N/A
Multi-Framework Support
25+ frameworks (SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST)
null+ frameworks ()
Common Frameworks
SOC 2, ISO 27001
SOC 2, ISO 27001
Starting Price
$15,000/year
Contact Sales
Auditor Included
Integrations
60+
N/A
Frameworks Supported
25+
N/A
Automation Level
Medium
N/A
G2 Rating
4.3/5 (170 reviews)
N/A
Best For
Organizations with mature risk management needs
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Resolver

Starting Price$15,000/year
Typical Range$15,000 - $150,000/year
Hidden CostsImplementation services
Auditor IncludedNo (separate fee)
Full Pricing Guide →

Neo4j

Starting PriceContact Sales
Typical RangeCustom pricing
Hidden CostsNone disclosed
Auditor IncludedNo (separate fee)
Full Pricing Guide →

Both platforms typically require a custom quote, though $15,000/year is the reported starting point. For 2026, we recommend Resolver for enterprise risk intelligence platform and Neo4j for undefined.

Our Verdict

Choose Resolver if: Organizations with mature risk management needs

Choose Neo4j if: null

Bottom Line: Resolver is designed for enterprise scale. Neo4j is a better fit for null.

Resolver Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Comprehensive risk platform
  • Strong incident management
  • Good for operational risk
  • Mature product (20+ years)
  • Enterprise-grade

Cons

  • Not for startups
  • Complex pricing
  • Long implementation

Neo4j Pros & Cons

Pros

    Cons

      Best-fit snapshot

      Resolver

      • Best fit: Organizations with mature risk management needs
      • Frameworks: SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST, HIPAA
      • Integrations: 60+ supported systems
      • Target market: Enterprise Risk Management

      Neo4j

      • Best fit: teams prioritizing audit readiness and faster implementations.
      • Framework coverage varies by plan and auditor requirements.
      • Integration depth varies by data source and plan.
      • Commonly used by growth-stage B2B teams.

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Is Resolver cheaper than Neo4j?

      Pricing varies based on company size and requirements. Request quotes from both vendors for accurate comparison.

      Which is better for startups: Resolver or Neo4j?

      Neither platform is specifically designed for startups. Consider alternatives like Vanta, Sprinto, or Secureframe for early-stage companies.

      Can I switch from Resolver to Neo4j?

      Yes, most compliance platforms support data export. However, evidence migration may require manual effort. Both Resolver and Neo4j offer onboarding support for migrating customers.

      Do Resolver or Neo4j include audit services?

      Neither Resolver nor Neo4j include audit services in their base pricing. You will need to engage a separate auditor, typically costing $8,000-$25,000 additionally.

      About this data: Our research team reviews and verifies platform information through vendor relationships, public documentation, and market analysis. Data is updated regularly.

      Learn about our methodology →

      Related Comparisons

      Still deciding?

      Use our SOC 2 Cost Calculator to estimate your total compliance investment.

      Calculate Your Costs