Skip to main content
Independent Analysis

Workiva vs Arthur Ai: Which Compliance Platform is Better in 2026?

Compare Workiva and Arthur Ai head-to-head. See pricing, features, integrations, and our expert verdict on which compliance automation platform is right for your business.

Summary

Updated February 2026

Both Workiva and Arthur Ai are established compliance automation platforms. Your choice depends on team size, budget, and compliance scope.

Workiva

  • Starting at $30,000/year
  • Best for: Public companies with complex reporting requirements

Arthur Ai

  • Starting at Contact Sales
  • Best for: Enterprise organizations
Last updated Jan 2026By RiscLens Research TeamOur methodology650 reviews analyzed

Sources: G2 Crowd, Capterra, Vendor Documentation, User Interviews

Independent research·No vendor payments·Updated Feb 2026
Feature
Workiva
Arthur Ai
Industry Fit
Large Enterprise
N/A
Multi-Framework Support
30+ frameworks (SOX, SEC, ESG)
null+ frameworks ()
Common Frameworks
SOC 2, ISO 27001
SOC 2, ISO 27001
Starting Price
$30,000/year
Contact Sales
Auditor Included
Integrations
100+
N/A
Frameworks Supported
30+
N/A
Automation Level
High
N/A
G2 Rating
4.4/5 (650 reviews)
N/A
Best For
Public companies with complex reporting requirements
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Workiva

Starting Price$30,000/year
Typical Range$30,000 - $300,000+/year
Hidden CostsImplementation and consulting
Auditor IncludedNo (separate fee)
Full Pricing Guide →

Arthur Ai

Starting PriceContact Sales
Typical RangeCustom pricing
Hidden CostsNone disclosed
Auditor IncludedNo (separate fee)
Full Pricing Guide →

Both platforms typically require a custom quote, though $30,000/year is the reported starting point. For 2026, we recommend Workiva for enterprise compliance reporting and Arthur Ai for undefined.

Our Verdict

Choose Workiva if: Public companies with complex reporting requirements

Choose Arthur Ai if: null

Bottom Line: Workiva is designed for enterprise scale. Arthur Ai is a better fit for null.

Workiva Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Industry leader in SOX
  • Excellent for public companies
  • Strong ESG capabilities
  • Connected data platform
  • Audit trail excellence

Cons

  • Not for SOC 2/ISO
  • Very high cost
  • Public company focused

Arthur Ai Pros & Cons

Pros

    Cons

      Best-fit snapshot

      Workiva

      • Best fit: Public companies with complex reporting requirements
      • Frameworks: SOX, SEC, ESG, XBRL
      • Integrations: 100+ supported systems
      • Target market: Large Enterprise

      Arthur Ai

      • Best fit: teams prioritizing audit readiness and faster implementations.
      • Framework coverage varies by plan and auditor requirements.
      • Integration depth varies by data source and plan.
      • Commonly used by growth-stage B2B teams.

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Is Workiva cheaper than Arthur Ai?

      Pricing varies based on company size and requirements. Request quotes from both vendors for accurate comparison.

      Which is better for startups: Workiva or Arthur Ai?

      Neither platform is specifically designed for startups. Consider alternatives like Vanta, Sprinto, or Secureframe for early-stage companies.

      Can I switch from Workiva to Arthur Ai?

      Yes, most compliance platforms support data export. However, evidence migration may require manual effort. Both Workiva and Arthur Ai offer onboarding support for migrating customers.

      Do Workiva or Arthur Ai include audit services?

      Neither Workiva nor Arthur Ai include audit services in their base pricing. You will need to engage a separate auditor, typically costing $8,000-$25,000 additionally.

      About this data: Our research team reviews and verifies platform information through vendor relationships, public documentation, and market analysis. Data is updated regularly.

      Learn about our methodology →

      Related Comparisons

      Still deciding?

      Use our SOC 2 Cost Calculator to estimate your total compliance investment.

      Calculate Your Costs