SOC 2 Type I vs Type II Readiness
Decide which audit type you’re realistically ready for—before you commit to Type I or Type II.
Built for early-stage teams who need a clear path without overcommitting to audit scope or timelines.
Check My SOC 2 ReadinessFree • No credit card • Business email required
Plain-English comparison
- Type I: point-in-time validation of control design and documentation.
- Type II: design + operating effectiveness over an observation window.
- Scope expands with systems, data sensitivity, and evidence quality expectations.
Timeline and cost implications
- Type I: faster; typically 2–6 weeks once controls and evidence are ready.
- Type II: adds 3–12 month observation; higher effort and audit fees.
- Typically, scope and evidence quality drive both timeline and cost.
Common early-stage mistakes
- Attempting Type II before controls and evidence are stable.
- Underestimating internal preparation time for evidence quality.
- Ignoring scope clarity—more systems and data types expand audit effort.
When each type makes sense
- Type I: proving control design quickly for enterprise buyers or early diligence.
- Type II: demonstrating operating effectiveness once controls, logs, and evidence are consistent.
- Most early-stage teams start with Type I, then plan Type II once operations are repeatable.
See My Type I vs Type II Readiness
Uses the existing readiness assessment—no new inputs required.