Skip to main content
RiscLens
Independent Analysis

OneTrust vs Neo4j: Which Compliance Platform is Better in 2026?

Compare OneTrust and Neo4j head-to-head. See pricing, features, integrations, and our expert verdict on which compliance automation platform is right for your business.

Summary

Updated February 2026

Both OneTrust and Neo4j are established compliance automation platforms. Your choice depends on team size, budget, and compliance scope.

OneTrust

  • Starting at $25,000/year
  • Best for: Global enterprises with privacy-focused compliance

Neo4j

  • Starting at Contact Sales
  • Best for: Enterprise organizations
Last updated Jan 2026By RiscLens Research TeamOur methodology350 reviews analyzed

Sources: G2 Crowd, Capterra, Vendor Documentation, User Interviews

Independent research·No vendor payments·Updated Feb 2026
Feature
OneTrust
Neo4j
Industry Fit
Enterprise
N/A
Multi-Framework Support
50+ frameworks (GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001)
null+ frameworks ()
Common Frameworks
SOC 2, ISO 27001
SOC 2, ISO 27001
Starting Price
$25,000/year
Contact Sales
Auditor Included
Integrations
200+
N/A
Frameworks Supported
50+
N/A
Automation Level
High
N/A
G2 Rating
4.3/5 (350 reviews)
N/A
Best For
Global enterprises with privacy-focused compliance
N/A

Pricing Comparison

OneTrust

Starting Price$25,000/year
Typical Range$25,000 - $500,000+/year
Hidden CostsImplementation and consulting
Auditor IncludedNo (separate fee)
Full Pricing Guide →

Neo4j

Starting PriceContact Sales
Typical RangeCustom pricing
Hidden CostsNone disclosed
Auditor IncludedNo (separate fee)
Full Pricing Guide →

Both platforms typically require a custom quote, though $25,000/year is the reported starting point. For 2026, we recommend OneTrust for privacy-first compliance automation and Neo4j for undefined.

Our Verdict

Choose OneTrust if: Global enterprises with privacy-focused compliance

Choose Neo4j if: null

Bottom Line: OneTrust is designed for enterprise scale. Neo4j is a better fit for null.

OneTrust Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Industry leader in privacy
  • Comprehensive consent management
  • Global regulation coverage
  • Enterprise scale
  • Strong data discovery

Cons

  • Very high cost
  • Long implementation cycles
  • May be overkill for SOC 2 only

Neo4j Pros & Cons

Pros

    Cons

      Best-fit snapshot

      OneTrust

      • •Best fit: Global enterprises with privacy-focused compliance
      • •Frameworks: GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001, SOC 2
      • •Integrations: 200+ supported systems
      • •Target market: Enterprise

      Neo4j

      • •Best fit: teams prioritizing audit readiness and faster implementations.
      • •Framework coverage varies by plan and auditor requirements.
      • •Integration depth varies by data source and plan.
      • •Commonly used by growth-stage B2B teams.

      Frequently Asked Questions

      Is OneTrust cheaper than Neo4j?

      Pricing varies based on company size and requirements. Request quotes from both vendors for accurate comparison.

      Which is better for startups: OneTrust or Neo4j?

      Neither platform is specifically designed for startups. Consider alternatives like Vanta, Sprinto, or Secureframe for early-stage companies.

      Can I switch from OneTrust to Neo4j?

      Yes, most compliance platforms support data export. However, evidence migration may require manual effort. Both OneTrust and Neo4j offer onboarding support for migrating customers.

      Do OneTrust or Neo4j include audit services?

      Neither OneTrust nor Neo4j include audit services in their base pricing. You will need to engage a separate auditor, typically costing $8,000-$25,000 additionally.

      Alternatives to Consider

      About this data: Our research team reviews and verifies platform information through vendor relationships, public documentation, and market analysis. Data is updated regularly.

      Learn about our methodology →

      Related Comparisons

      Still deciding?

      Use our SOC 2 Cost Calculator to estimate your total compliance investment.

      Calculate Your Costs